Timken Makes Like Will Smith and the DJ Jazzy Jeff with Voting Standards, Getting Jiggy With Them


Timken Proposes to Lower Certain Director Voting Thresholds By Reverting to State Law Default, But Raises Others While Activists Push For Break Up

The Timken Company (TKR) filed a Form 8-K with a notice that it would propose to amend its articles and bylaws (referred to as its “Regulations”) to remove the supermajority voting requirements for:

  1. substituting for unavailable director nominees;
  2. changing the number of directors; and
  3. removing directors.

Timken stated that as a result, the articles and Regulations will contain no shareholder voting threshold other than a majority of votes cast or a majority of the shares entitled to vote, subject to the default voting standards under Ohio law.

Nifty.  Let the shareholders have their say, right?

This is curious since Relational Investors, LLC and CalSTRS are pushing for a spin-off of Timken‘s steel business from its ball bearing business.

But wait, there’s more!

Timken continued to say that if the governance proposals are approved, a number of actions subject to the approval of the shareholders would require greater than a majority of votes cast or the majority of the shares entitled to vote thereon under the default voting standards in Ohio. For example, the default voting standard for the approval of a merger or consolidation or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets would require the approval of two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote thereon.

Basically, Timken is proposing to:

  1. remove the ability of a block of shares to veto director election mechanics, and
  2. ratchet up the requirement to merge or break up the company.

As this is an Opps Tracker pick [Ed.  Up 9.56% in less than 1 month!!!!], we’ll continue to keep an eye on it.

Timken Form 8-K Regarding Proposals to Change Voting Requirements

Our apologies for those expecting more Neil Sedaka this time.  He doesn’t quite have the SEO weight of DJ Jazzy Jeff and that other guy, whose dead weight he carried for so many years.
This entry was posted in Activist Investor, Hedge Funds, Opps, Relational Investors and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>